Software test planning eBook

Software test manager guide? Treat testing like a team effort. “Testing is a team effort. You’ll find keeping everyone in the loop from the beginning will save an enormous amount of time down the line. “When you expose testers to a greater amount of the project, they will feel much more comfortable and confident in what their goals should be. A tester is only as efficient as their team. “Your goal is to make sure everyone involved in the project has a solid understanding of the application. When everyone understands what the application entails, testers can effectively cover the test cases.

You may decide that you want to do a little of each methodology or make up your own process. It doesn’t really matter as long as you have your process documented. That way, you can ensure all of the team are on the same page when it comes to projects across your organisation, plus any rogue testers can be directed to the process in order to straighten them out if need be. Manage your risk. Easy to say, sometimes hard to do. Especially if you have limited or no requirements. Having the team prioritise which functional areas need to be tested first, based on risk, will typically pay off. Ensure you invest a little bit more time up front in your planning and get those risky areas tested early, this will shakedown the critical code paths before you get too far down the test execution track and then run out of time.

Lucian Cania is an experienced international IT delivery and software test manager with a vast experience in test management. He founder Cania Consulting by leveraging a vast background in Transformation Programs executed across Europe in the areas of ERP, BI, Retail, Billing and Integration. After passing the ISTQB Foundation Certification, this eBook was great source to better understand what to expect from the Test Managers working on my Software Projects. Find extra details on Astqb Book.

Bug summaries must be thorough. Most customers including your managers, developers, and peers will read the summary first when they review a bug. This is especially true when they have more bugs to review. The simple reason is that they don’t have enough time to go into details of every bug, so having a short and concise summary will surely help to grab an idea of what the problem is about and how important it is. You can have a short and concise summary by telling exactly what problem you found and in what condition. Use Test Maturity Model integration. The software industry does not operate in a zero-defect environment, and, arguably, it never will. In the face of this truism, numerous techniques to reduce the number and severity of defects in software have been developed, with the ultimate, albeit unobtainable, goal of defect elimination. Such optimistic thinking has led to significant improvements in software quality over the past decade, notwithstanding increased software complexity and customer demands.

Work from home software testing tip for today : We recommend that you choose a very, very small number of apps that are your source of truth – so everyone knows where to go to see what they and others need to do. For example we are using SpiraPlan as our sole source of truth of product development and testing tasks. We use: Tasks for development activities, Incidents for any bugs to be fixed, test Sets for any assigned tests to be run. With requirements and releases/sprints being used to roll-up the information to see what needs to be done across multiple tasks and test cases. We have a rule that anything that is in Google Chat or email is not by itself a task, to avoid confusion about priorities. If you want me to remember to do it after the next 5 minutes, don’t put it in Chat or Spira instant messenger. Chat is only for immediate questions/responses, not task assignment. For other, non-development teams, there should be an equivalent source of truth (CRM activities log for sales, KronoDesk support tickets for support, etc.) Discover extra info on https://cania-consulting.com/.